Private health research
Research, provider comparison, information coordination and practical navigation through complex health situations.
I organise the records, examine the evidence and set out what is established, what remains uncertain and what to ask next.
Independent research and preparation that works alongside your clinicians.
One example, shown in full
What does the written work actually look like?
A fictional composite: one question, its evidence and its limits, exactly as the work is delivered.
See an example of the written workWhat people bring
Situations that call for this practice.
This practice is for situations where records, clinicians, tests, providers, options and follow-ups may become difficult to hold together.
-
A parent's records sit with several teams, and nobody holds the whole file. Two reports appear to disagree, and the difference has not been written down.
Records -
Providers and options have already been named, but they have not been compared in one place. What each path involves, and what to ask next, is still scattered.
Providers -
Letters, results and follow-ups keep arriving, and the earlier picture is already out of date. What is new, what has changed and what is still open has not been written down.
Changes
What comes back
A written answer, with its sources and its limits.
-
The question, restated
The agreed question in one sentence, so there is no argument later about what was asked.
-
What the records establish
Each finding with the source it came from and the state that source earned it. Where reports differ, the difference is written down.
-
What remains uncertain
The points the material cannot settle, written as unresolved rather than rounded off.
-
What to ask next
The questions worth putting to the people already involved, and a clear view of the providers or options already named.
-
Where every statement came from
Named sources throughout, so any line can be checked by someone else.
How a claim is graded
Every claim carries the state its evidence earned.
The state is written on each claim, never signalled by colour alone, and a claim does not move up a state because it was stated confidently.
Illustrative map. A fictional composite, shown as claims are graded.
-
ESTABLISHED
Two laboratories using different assays can report the same sample on either side of a reference range.
Where it came from: Both laboratories' own published method notes.
-
MECHANISTICALLY PLAUSIBLE
Low iron stores could contribute to unrefreshing sleep alongside the thyroid picture, by a route that is described but untested here.
Where it came from: Review articles describing the mechanism, not this case.
-
PRELIMINARY
Taking the sample before the morning supplement may change what the iron reading shows.
Where it came from: Two small studies, neither replicated at this size.
-
ANECDOTAL
Energy improved within a fortnight of pausing the supplement.
Where it came from: One person's diary, recorded at the time.
-
UNKNOWN
Whether the April rise was a real change or a difference between the two assays.
Where it came from: No repeat panel run on the same assay exists.
It is research and decision support. It is not a diagnosis, a treatment decision or a clinical opinion.
One action
One situation, organised properly.
Starting is an enquiry, not a payment. Describe the question and what a useful answer would change, and I will tell you honestly whether this is the right kind of help.